↓ Skip to main content

Physiological and performance effects of glycerol hyperhydration and rehydration

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Reviews, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
3 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physiological and performance effects of glycerol hyperhydration and rehydration
Published in
Nutrition Reviews, October 2014
DOI 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00254.x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon P Van Rosendal, Mark A Osborne, Robert G Fassett, Jeff S Coombes

Abstract

Studies have shown that beverages containing glycerol can enhance and maintain hydration status and may improve endurance exercise performance by attenuating adverse physiological changes associated with dehydration. Improvements to performance include increased endurance time to exhaustion by up to 24%, or a 5% increase in power or work. However, some studies have found no performance benefits during either prolonged exercise or specific skill and agility tests. In studies that have shown benefits, the improvements have been associated with thermoregulatory and cardiovascular changes. These include increased plasma volume and sweat rates, as well as reduced core temperature and ratings of perceived exertion. In a very small number of subjects, glycerol consumption has been associated with side-effects including nausea, gastrointestinal discomfort, dizziness, and headaches. In summary, while glycerol and fluid ingestion results in hyperhydration, the documented benefits to exercise performance remain inconsistent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
Unknown 81 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Student > Master 10 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 23 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 15 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 26 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Reviews
#1,758
of 2,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,240
of 271,179 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Reviews
#185
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,092 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,179 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.