↓ Skip to main content

Electromagnetic resonant properties of metal-dielectric-metal (MDM) cylindrical microcavities

Overview of attention for article published in Photonic Sensors, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Electromagnetic resonant properties of metal-dielectric-metal (MDM) cylindrical microcavities
Published in
Photonic Sensors, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13320-017-0379-3
Authors

Hang Heng, Rong Wang

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 29%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Student > Master 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 29%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 14%
Energy 1 14%
Psychology 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2017.
All research outputs
#17,286,645
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Photonic Sensors
#46
of 61 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,035
of 422,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Photonic Sensors
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 61 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.