↓ Skip to main content

Enhanced Bulbar Function in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The Nuedexta Treatment Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Neurotherapeutics, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
80 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
Title
Enhanced Bulbar Function in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The Nuedexta Treatment Trial
Published in
Neurotherapeutics, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s13311-016-0508-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Richard Smith, Erik Pioro, Kathleen Myers, Michael Sirdofsky, Kimberly Goslin, Gregg Meekins, Hong Yu, James Wymer, Merit Cudkowicz, Eric A. Macklin, David Schoenfeld, Gary Pattee

Abstract

The goal of this randomized, blinded, crossover clinical trial was to determine whether Nuedexta (dextromethorphan and quinidine) enhanced speech, swallowing, and salivation in patients with ALS. Sixty patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) received either Nuedexta or placebo for 28 to 30 days, followed by a 10 to 15-day washout period. Subsequently, patients were switched to the opposite treatment arm for the remaining days of the trial. The primary endpoint was a reduction in the self-report Center for Neurologic Study Bulbar Function Scale (CNS-BFS) score. The rater-administered ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised was the principal secondary endpoint. The CNS-BFS score improved with active treatment, decreasing from a mean of 59.3 in the placebo arm of the trial to 53.5 during the drug-treatment arm (p < 0.001). Each of the individual domains of bulbar function interrogated by the CNS-BFS responded to treatment with Nuedexta as follows: 1) salivation: 15.8 versus 14.3 (p = 0.004); speech: 24.6 versus 22.2 (p = 0.003); swallowing: 18.9 versus 17.1 (p = 0.009). Similarly, the bulbar component of the ALS Functional Rating Scale Revised improved with active treatment (p = 0.003), although the drug did not affect the motor and respiratory components of this scale. This study is unique for several reasons. Firstly, it was driven by patient reports of improved speech and swallowing while taking Nuedexta for control of emotional lability. Secondly, the study was conducted over a short duration (70 days), and thirdly, a self-report scale was selected as the principle outcome measure. Considering the importance of bulbar functions, these results, if confirmed, point to an additional use of Nuedexta as an adjunct to the management of ALS.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 133 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 12%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Student > Postgraduate 9 7%
Other 31 23%
Unknown 39 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 25%
Neuroscience 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 44 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,073,681
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Neurotherapeutics
#76
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,398
of 422,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurotherapeutics
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.