↓ Skip to main content

Why it is Disrespectful to Violate Rights: Contractualism and the Kind-Desire Theory

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Why it is Disrespectful to Violate Rights: Contractualism and the Kind-Desire Theory
Published in
Philosophical Studies, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11098-017-0857-x
Authors

Janis David Schaab

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 67%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 2 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 33%
Arts and Humanities 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2017.
All research outputs
#14,311,050
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#548
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,704
of 420,788 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#12
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,788 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.