| Title |
Research output availability on academic social networks: implications for stakeholders in academic publishing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Electronic Markets, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12525-016-0242-1 |
| Authors |
Mikael Laakso, Juho Lindman, Cenyu Shen, Linus Nyman, Bo-Christer Björk |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 5 | 19% |
| Germany | 4 | 15% |
| Norway | 2 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 4% |
| Sweden | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 63% |
| Scientists | 7 | 26% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Croatia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 25 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 21% |
| Unknown | 20 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 46 | 35% |
| Computer Science | 20 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 12 | 9% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 5% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 19 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2017.
All research outputs
#1,316,546
of 24,558,777 outputs
Outputs from Electronic Markets
#14
of 616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,056
of 430,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Electronic Markets
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,558,777 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,820 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.