↓ Skip to main content

Physician attitudes regarding telephone medicine

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
Title
Physician attitudes regarding telephone medicine
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, November 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02600159
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark D. Hannis, Ruth L Hazard, Marylee Rothschild, D. Michael Elnicki, Thomas C. Keyserling, Robert F. DeVellis, the TELI Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 16 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 3 18%
Student > Master 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Professor 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Other 3 18%
Unknown 2 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 65%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 12%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 3 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,943,894
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#4,251
of 7,806 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,108
of 29,729 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,806 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,729 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.