| Title |
Knowledge translation to fitness trainers: A systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-5-28 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dawn Stacey, Michael Hopkins, Kristi B Adamo, Risa Shorr, Denis Prud'homme |
| Abstract |
This study investigates approaches for translating evidence-based knowledge for use by fitness trainers. Specific questions were: Where do fitness trainers get their evidence-based information? What types of interventions are effective for translating evidence-based knowledge for use by fitness trainers? What are the barriers and facilitators to the use of evidence-based information by fitness trainers in their practice? |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 20% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 17 | 15% |
| Unknown | 37 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2017.
All research outputs
#12,817,346
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,322
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,122
of 94,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#4
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.