↓ Skip to main content

The role of the placenta in fetal exposure to heavy metals

Overview of attention for article published in Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 436)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
215 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
248 Mendeley
Title
The role of the placenta in fetal exposure to heavy metals
Published in
Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10354-012-0074-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Claudia Gundacker, Markus Hengstschläger

Abstract

The heavy metals mercury, lead, and cadmium are toxicants, which are well-known to cross the placenta and to accumulate in fetal tissues. Prenatal exposure to mercury and lead poses a health threat particularly to the developing brain. Fetal exposures to lead and cadmium correlate with reduced birth weight and birth size. The placental passage of cadmium is limited suggesting a partial barrier for this metal. It is very likely that metallothionein is responsible for placental storage of the metals especially of cadmium. It is unclear, however, which proteins are involved in placental uptake and efflux of the metals and where the transporters are located at the placental barrier. Hence, only certain aspects of placental metal toxicokinetics are known so far. The metals have also been shown to adversely affect placental functions. Both metal-specific placental transfer and impairment of placental function can explain the relationships between prenatal metal exposures and adverse effects on intrauterine growth and (neuro)development.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 248 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 243 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 37 15%
Researcher 34 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 14%
Student > Bachelor 29 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 10%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 55 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 24 10%
Environmental Science 22 9%
Chemistry 10 4%
Other 35 14%
Unknown 67 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,492,442
of 23,849,058 outputs
Outputs from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#18
of 436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,688
of 165,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Wiener Medizinische Wochenschrift
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,849,058 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.