| Title |
Methods for the estimation of loss of life due to floods: a literature review and a proposal for a new method
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, April 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-008-9227-5 |
| Authors |
S. N. Jonkman, J. K. Vrijling, A. C. W. M. Vrouwenvelder |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 310 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 3 | <1% |
| Belgium | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 295 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 57 | 18% |
| Researcher | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 49 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 12% |
| Unknown | 84 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 92 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 46 | 15% |
| Environmental Science | 38 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 15 | 5% |
| Unknown | 102 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#4,886,083
of 23,504,998 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#617
of 1,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,348
of 68,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#2
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,504,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,863 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.