↓ Skip to main content

Sources of medicine information and their reliability evaluated by medicine users

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, May 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Sources of medicine information and their reliability evaluated by medicine users
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, May 2007
DOI 10.1007/s11096-007-9131-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ulla Närhi

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 25%
Researcher 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Psychology 3 5%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 15 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#655
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,217
of 90,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.