| Title |
Abundance estimates of the Indo-Pacific lionfish Pterois volitans/miles complex in the Western North Atlantic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, June 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-006-9005-9 |
| Authors |
Paula E. Whitfield, Jonathan A. Hare, Andrew W. David, Stacey L. Harter, Roldan C. Muñoz, Christine M. Addison |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 4% |
| Mexico | 5 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Argentina | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belize | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 290 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 67 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 64 | 20% |
| Researcher | 61 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 48 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 41 | 13% |
| Unknown | 26 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 205 | 64% |
| Environmental Science | 49 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 4% |
| Unknown | 35 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2023.
All research outputs
#1,962,921
of 23,462,326 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#277
of 2,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,433
of 65,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,462,326 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,387 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 65,581 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.