↓ Skip to main content

Chemoimmunotherapy: reengineering tumor immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, February 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
7 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
208 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
Title
Chemoimmunotherapy: reengineering tumor immunity
Published in
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, February 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00262-012-1388-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gang Chen, Leisha A. Emens

Abstract

Cancer chemotherapy drugs have long been considered immune suppressive. However, more recent data indicate that some cytotoxic drugs effectively treat cancer in part by facilitating an immune response to the tumor when given at the standard dose and schedule. These drugs induce a form of tumor cell death that is immunologically active, thereby inducing an adaptive immune response specific for the tumor. In addition, cancer chemotherapy drugs can promote tumor immunity through ancillary and largely unappreciated immunologic effects on both the malignant and normal host cells present within the tumor microenvironment. These more subtle immunomodulatory effects are dependent on the drug itself, its dose, and its schedule in relation to an immune-based intervention. The recent approvals of two new immune-based therapies for prostate cancer and melanoma herald a new era in cancer treatment and have led to heightened interest in immunotherapy as a valid approach to cancer treatment. A detailed understanding of the cellular and molecular basis of interactions between chemotherapy drugs and the immune system is essential for devising the optimal strategy for integrating new immune-based therapies into the standard of care for various cancers, resulting in the greatest long-term clinical benefit for cancer patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 24%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Master 22 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 31 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 37 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 13%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 6%
Chemistry 8 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 39 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,808,355
of 23,394,907 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#396
of 2,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,500
of 286,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,394,907 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,929 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,366 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.