↓ Skip to main content

Behavioral Interventions to Reduce HIV-related Sexual Risk Behavior: Review and Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
216 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Behavioral Interventions to Reduce HIV-related Sexual Risk Behavior: Review and Synthesis of Meta-Analytic Evidence
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, September 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10461-007-9313-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seth M. Noar

Abstract

Over the past 25 years, scores of behavioral interventions to reduce HIV-related sexual risk behavior have been developed and evaluated. The purpose of the current study was to synthesize what is known about such interventions by systematically reviewing and synthesizing extant meta-analyses of the literature. Comprehensive search procedures resulted in a set of 18 meta-analyses that targeted HIV-related sexual risk behavior in a defined target population. The median meta-analysis in the review contained k = 19 primary studies with a cumulative N = 9,423 participants. All meta-analyses (11/11) that examined condom use found a statistically significant increase (median effect: OR = 1.34); 9/11 for reducing unprotected sex (median effect: OR = .76); 3/8 for reducing numbers of sexual partners (median effect: OR = .87); 4/6 for reduction of STDs (median effect: OR = .74); and 5/5 for reducing composite sexual risk (median effect: OR = .78). Summaries of moderator analyses suggested particular participant, intervention, and methodological characteristics that may influence the success of interventions. Implications include achieving a broader understanding of intervention moderators as well as increasing effectiveness trials and translation/dissemination of efficacious interventions to those populations most at risk.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 3%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 150 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 18%
Student > Master 19 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 11%
Professor 11 7%
Other 33 21%
Unknown 19 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 42 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 22%
Psychology 30 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 6%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,040,764
of 24,315,442 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#749
of 3,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,008
of 73,108 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#8
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,315,442 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 73,108 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.