You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Source identification of lead found in tissues of sailors from the Franklin Arctic Expedition of 1845
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Archaeological Science, March 1991
|
| DOI | 10.1016/0305-4403(91)90048-t |
| Authors |
Walter Kowal, Owen B. Beattie, Halfdan Baadsgaard, Peter M. Krahn |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 18 | 86% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 24% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 19% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 14% |
| Chemistry | 3 | 14% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2014.
All research outputs
#1,067,664
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Archaeological Science
#268
of 2,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165
of 16,373 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Archaeological Science
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,997 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 16,373 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them