| Title |
Subdural hemorrhage as an initial sign of glutaric aciduria type 1: A diagnostic pitfall
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pediatric Radiology, November 1996
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01396200 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J. Woelfle, B. Kreft, D. Emons, F. Haverkamp |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 29% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 47% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 12% |
| Psychology | 1 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#4,732,718
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Radiology
#352
of 2,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,861
of 29,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Radiology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,090 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 29,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them