↓ Skip to main content

Glutaric aciduria type 1 (glutaryl-CoA-dehydrogenase deficiency): advances and unanswered questions

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Glutaric aciduria type 1 (glutaryl-CoA-dehydrogenase deficiency): advances and unanswered questions
Published in
European Journal of Pediatrics, December 2012
DOI 10.1007/s004310050721
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. Superti-Furga, G. F. Hoffmann

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 31%
Student > Master 3 23%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Researcher 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 54%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Engineering 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Pediatrics
#1,474
of 3,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,777
of 278,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Pediatrics
#15
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 278,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.