↓ Skip to main content

The Longitudinal Effects of Parenting on Adaptive Behavior in Children with Fragile X Syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
Title
The Longitudinal Effects of Parenting on Adaptive Behavior in Children with Fragile X Syndrome
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10803-016-2999-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven F. Warren, Nancy Brady, Kandace K. Fleming, Laura J. Hahn

Abstract

Several studies have reported declines in adaptive behavior amongst children with fragile X syndrome (FXS) starting in middle childhood. We examined the effects of maternal responsivity on adaptive behavior in 55 children with FXS visited 5-6 times in their homes from early through middle childhood. Our analyses indicated that sustained maternal responsivity had a significant positive impact on the trajectories of communication and to a lesser extent other adaptive behavior domains through middle childhood with many effects remaining significant after controlling for autism symptoms and developmental level. For children who showed declines in adaptive behavior during middle childhood, sustained high levels of maternal responsivity minimized the amount of decline observed in the communication, socialization, and daily living domains.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 14%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 9 9%
Researcher 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 37 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 10%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 6%
Neuroscience 2 2%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 45 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2017.
All research outputs
#849,613
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#286
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,200
of 427,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.