↓ Skip to main content

Revision of Andropogon and Diectomis (Poaceae: Sacchareae) in Madagascar and the new Andropogon itremoensis from the Itremo Massif

Overview of attention for article published in Kew Bulletin, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Revision of Andropogon and Diectomis (Poaceae: Sacchareae) in Madagascar and the new Andropogon itremoensis from the Itremo Massif
Published in
Kew Bulletin, June 2013
DOI 10.1007/s12225-013-9443-3
Authors

Maria S. Vorontsova, Gaetan Ratovonirina, Tianjanahary Randriamboavonjy

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 54%
Student > Master 3 23%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 54%
Environmental Science 4 31%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#17,666,271
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#976
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,194
of 197,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#15
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,464 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.