↓ Skip to main content

Limbic and Callosal White Matter Changes in Euthymic Bipolar I Disorder: An Advanced Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tractography Study

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Psychiatry, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Limbic and Callosal White Matter Changes in Euthymic Bipolar I Disorder: An Advanced Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tractography Study
Published in
Biological Psychiatry, November 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.09.023
Pubmed ID
Authors

Louise Emsell, Alexander Leemans, Camilla Langan, Wim Van Hecke, Gareth J. Barker, Peter McCarthy, Ben Jeurissen, Jan Sijbers, Stefan Sunaert, Dara M. Cannon, Colm McDonald

Abstract

White matter microstructural changes detected using diffusion tensor imaging have been reported in bipolar disorder. However, findings are heterogeneous, which may be related to the use of analysis techniques that cannot adequately model crossing fibers in the brain. We therefore sought to identify altered diffusion anisotropy and diffusivity changes using an improved high angular resolution fiber-tracking technique.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 91 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 18 18%
Researcher 14 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 9%
Student > Postgraduate 7 7%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 18 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 24%
Neuroscience 14 14%
Psychology 11 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 9%
Engineering 8 8%
Other 13 13%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#19,944,994
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biological Psychiatry
#5,638
of 6,596 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,068
of 192,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Psychiatry
#59
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,596 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,733 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.