↓ Skip to main content

Bracing of the Reconstructed and Osteoarthritic Knee during High Dynamic Load Tasks

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bracing of the Reconstructed and Osteoarthritic Knee during High Dynamic Load Tasks
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, June 2017
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000001201
Pubmed ID
Authors

HARVI F. HART, KAY M. CROSSLEY, NATALIE J. COLLINS, DAVID C. ACKLAND

Abstract

Lateral compartment osteoarthritis accompanied by abnormal knee biomechanics are frequently reported in individuals with knee osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in knee biomechanics produced by an adjusted and unadjusted varus knee brace during high dynamic loading activities in individuals with lateral knee osteoarthritis after ACLR and valgus malalignment. Nineteen participants who had undergone ACLR 5 to 20 years previously and had symptomatic and radiographic lateral knee osteoarthritis with valgus malalignment were assessed. Quantitative motion analysis experiments were conducted during hopping, stair ascent and descent under three test conditions: (i) no brace, (ii) unadjusted brace with sagittal plane support and neutral frontal plane alignment, and (iii) adjusted brace with sagittal plane support and varus realignment (valgus to neutral). Sagittal, frontal and transverse plane knee kinematics, external joint moment and angular impulse data were calculated. Relative to an unbraced knee, braced conditions significantly increased knee flexion and adduction angles during hopping (p=0.003, p=0.005; respectively), stair ascent (p=0.003, p<0.001, respectively) and descent (p=0.009, p<0.001, respectively). In addition, the brace conditions increased knee flexion (p<0.001) and adduction (p=0.001) angular impulses and knee stiffness (p<0.001) during hopping, as well as increased knee adduction moments during stair ascent (p= 0.008) and flexion moments during stair descent (p=0.006). There were no significant differences between the adjusted and unadjusted brace conditions (p>0.05). A knee brace, with or without varus alignment, can modulate knee kinematics and external joint moments during hopping, stairs ascent and descent in individuals with predominant lateral knee osteoarthritis after ACLR. Longer-term use of a brace may have implications in slowing osteoarthritis progression.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 78 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Student > Master 8 10%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 25 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 27%
Engineering 8 10%
Sports and Recreations 8 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 29 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2017.
All research outputs
#5,131,024
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#3,097
of 7,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,493
of 330,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#53
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.