↓ Skip to main content

Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction

Overview of attention for book
Cover of 'Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction'

Table of Contents

  1. Altmetric Badge
    Book Overview
  2. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 1 R for genome-wide association studies.
  3. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 2 Descriptive statistics of data: understanding the data set and phenotypes of interest.
  4. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 3 Designing a GWAS: Power, Sample Size, and Data Structure.
  5. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 4 Managing Large SNP Datasets with SNPpy.
  6. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 5 Quality control for genome-wide association studies.
  7. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 6 Overview of Statistical Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
  8. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 7 Statistical analysis of genomic data.
  9. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 8 Using PLINK for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) and Data Analysis.
  10. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 9 Genome-Wide Complex Trait Analysis (GCTA): Methods, Data Analyses, and Interpretations
  11. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 10 Bayesian Methods Applied to GWAS.
  12. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 11 Implementing a QTL Detection Study (GWAS) Using Genomic Prediction Methodology.
  13. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 12 Genome-Enabled Prediction Using the BLR (Bayesian Linear Regression) R-Package.
  14. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 13 Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (gBLUP) for the Estimation of Genomic Breeding Values.
  15. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 14 Detecting regions of homozygosity to map the cause of recessively inherited disease.
  16. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 15 Use of ancestral haplotypes in genome-wide association studies.
  17. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 16 Genotype phasing in populations of closely related individuals.
  18. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 17 Genotype Imputation to Increase Sample Size in Pedigreed Populations
  19. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 18 Validation of Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) Results.
  20. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 19 Detection of Signatures of Selection Using F ST.
  21. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 20 Association weight matrix: a network-based approach towards functional genome-wide association studies.
  22. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 21 Mixed effects structural equation models and phenotypic causal networks.
  23. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 22 Epistasis, complexity, and multifactor dimensionality reduction.
  24. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 23 Applications of Multifactor Dimensionality Reduction to Genome-Wide Data Using the R Package 'MDR'.
  25. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 24 Higher order interactions: detection of epistasis using machine learning and evolutionary computation.
  26. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 25 Incorporating prior knowledge to increase the power of genome-wide association studies.
  27. Altmetric Badge
    Chapter 26 Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction
Attention for Chapter 6: Overview of Statistical Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
236 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Chapter title
Overview of Statistical Methods for Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS).
Chapter number 6
Book title
Genome-Wide Association Studies and Genomic Prediction
Published in
Methods in molecular biology, May 2013
DOI 10.1007/978-1-62703-447-0_6
Pubmed ID
Book ISBNs
978-1-62703-446-3, 978-1-62703-447-0
Authors

Ben Hayes, Hayes, Ben

Editors

Cedric Gondro, Julius van der Werf, Ben Hayes

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 236 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Colombia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 231 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 18%
Researcher 28 12%
Student > Master 28 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 27 11%
Student > Bachelor 20 8%
Other 24 10%
Unknown 67 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 34 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 7%
Computer Science 7 3%
Neuroscience 6 3%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 72 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 August 2020.
All research outputs
#15,423,393
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Methods in molecular biology
#5,361
of 13,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,347
of 194,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Methods in molecular biology
#14
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.