↓ Skip to main content

Pornography, Religion, and Parent–Child Relationship Quality

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Sexual Behavior, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
83 Mendeley
Title
Pornography, Religion, and Parent–Child Relationship Quality
Published in
Archives of Sexual Behavior, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s10508-016-0927-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samuel L. Perry, Kara J. Snawder

Abstract

Frequent pornography use is often negatively associated with marital quality. Recent research has argued that this negative association is particularly strong for those who are embedded in religious communities, likely due to the greater stigma and shame associated with viewing pornography. In order to test and extend this theory, the current study examined how religious service attendance moderates the link between parents' pornography consumption and four measures of parent-child relationship quality. Analyses of 2006 Portraits of American Life Study data (N = 2610) revealed that greater pornography viewing predicted negative outcomes on two out of four measures of parent-child relationship quality, while religious service attendance was associated with more positive parent-child relationship outcomes. Interaction effects, however, affirmed that the negative association between porn viewing frequency and three parent-child relationship outcomes was stronger for participants who attended religious services more often. Analyzing fathers (N = 771) and mothers (N = 904) separately revealed that the observed relationships held more consistently for fathers than mothers. Evidence for directionality was presented by incorporating re-interview data from 2012. While pornography use may be negatively associated with some aspects of parent-child relationship quality, this association was particularly strong for those embedded within religious communities, possibly owing to greater attendant guilt and shame.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 83 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 83 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 20%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 26 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 26 31%
Social Sciences 13 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 4%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 29 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,446,201
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#2,634
of 3,469 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,047
of 420,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Sexual Behavior
#35
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,469 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,412 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.