↓ Skip to main content

Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Heart, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
300 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of echocardiography for pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Heart, February 2011
DOI 10.1136/hrt.2010.212084
Pubmed ID
Authors

Surinder Janda, Neal Shahidi, Kenneth Gin, John Swiston

Abstract

Right heart catheterisation is the gold standard for the diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension. However, echocardiography is frequently used to screen for this disease and monitor progression over time because it is non-invasive, widely available and relatively inexpensive.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 2%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 199 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 15%
Other 31 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 12%
Student > Postgraduate 22 11%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Other 48 23%
Unknown 33 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 132 63%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Engineering 6 3%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 2%
Unspecified 3 1%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,669,289
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Heart
#959
of 6,710 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,527
of 117,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Heart
#2
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,710 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.