| Title |
Prediction of SAMPL3 host–guest binding affinities: evaluating the accuracy of generalized force-fields
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10822-012-9544-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hari S. Muddana, Michael K. Gilson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 15% |
| France | 1 | 3% |
| Romania | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 32 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 25% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 16 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#8,694,310
of 25,759,158 outputs
Outputs from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#421
of 952 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,231
of 253,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Perspectives in Drug Discovery and Design
#15
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,759,158 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 952 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 253,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.