| Title |
Human and mouse neuroinflammation markers in Niemann‐Pick disease, type C1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10545-013-9610-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Stephanie M. Cologna, Celine V. M. Cluzeau, Nicole M. Yanjanin, Paul S. Blank, Michelle K. Dail, Stephan Siebel, Cynthia L. Toth, Christopher A. Wassif, Andrew P. Lieberman, Forbes D. Porter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 68 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 19% |
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 14 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 13% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,780,612
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#464
of 1,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,956
of 194,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,859 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 194,031 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.