| Title |
Reoperation after lumbar disc surgery in two hundred and seven patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Orthopaedics, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00264-013-1925-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiwei Cheng, Hongwei Wang, Wenjie Zheng, Changqing Li, Jian Wang, Zhengfeng Zhang, Bo Huang, Yue Zhou |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare the causes and characteristics of reoperations after different primary operations for lumbar disc herniation (LDH). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 46 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 52% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Engineering | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2013.
All research outputs
#13,689,431
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from International Orthopaedics
#780
of 1,425 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,485
of 195,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Orthopaedics
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,425 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.