↓ Skip to main content

The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
The case for regularity in mechanistic causal explanation
Published in
Synthese, June 2011
DOI 10.1007/s11229-011-9965-x
Authors

Holly Andersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 40 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 12%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 7 17%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 23 55%
Psychology 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 5 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2012.
All research outputs
#20,194,368
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#2,282
of 2,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,304
of 113,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#13
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,642 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.