| Title |
Construct validity of functional capacity tests in healthy workers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-180 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sandra E Lakke, Remko Soer, Jan HB Geertzen, Harriët Wittink, Rob KW Douma, Cees P van der Schans, Michiel F Reneman |
| Abstract |
Functional Capacity (FC) is a multidimensional construct within the activity domain of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework (ICF). Functional capacity evaluations (FCEs) are assessments of work-related FC. The extent to which these work-related FC tests are associated to bio-, psycho-, or social factors is unknown. The aims of this study were to test relationships between FC tests and other ICF factors in a sample of healthy workers, and to determine the amount of statistical variance in FC tests that can be explained by these factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 111 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 14% |
| Psychology | 14 | 13% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 34 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2013.
All research outputs
#18,340,012
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,116
of 4,029 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#148,320
of 197,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#68
of 71 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,029 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 71 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.