You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Aquatic Global Passive Sampling (AQUA-GAPS) Revisited: First Steps toward a Network of Networks for Monitoring Organic Contaminants in the Aquatic Environment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, January 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1021/acs.est.6b05159 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rainer Lohmann, Derek Muir, Eddy Y. Zeng, Lian-Jun Bao, Ian J. Allan, Kenneth Arinaitwe, Kees Booij, Paul Helm, Sarit Kaserzon, Jochen F. Mueller, Yasuyuki Shibata, Foppe Smedes, Manolis Tsapakis, Charles S. Wong, Jing You |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 119 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 20% |
| Researcher | 22 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 29 | 24% |
| Chemistry | 22 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 7% |
| Engineering | 7 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 42 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2017.
All research outputs
#16,502,531
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#16,808
of 21,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248,680
of 430,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#202
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.7. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,518 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.