↓ Skip to main content

Advertising bans as a means of tobacco control policy: a systematic literature review of time-series analyses

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Public Health, October 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
Title
Advertising bans as a means of tobacco control policy: a systematic literature review of time-series analyses
Published in
International Journal of Public Health, October 2007
DOI 10.1007/s00038-007-5131-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilm Quentin, Simone Neubauer, Reiner Leidl, Hans-Helmut König

Abstract

This paper reviews the international literature that employed time-series analysis to evaluate the effects of advertising bans on aggregate consumption of cigarettes or tobacco. A systematic search of the literature was conducted. Three groups of studies representing analyses of advertising bans in the U.S.A., in other countries and in 22 OECD countries were defined. The estimated effects of advertising bans and their significance were analysed. 24 studies were identified. They used a wide array of explanatory variables, models, estimating methods and data sources. 18 studies found a negative effect of an advertising ban on aggregate consumption, but only ten of these studies found a significant effect. Two studies using data from 22 OECD countries suggested that partial bans would have little or no influence on aggregate consumption, whereas complete bans would significantly reduce consumption. The results imply that advertising bans have a negative but sometimes only narrow impact on consumption. Complete bans let expect a higher effectiveness. Because of methodological restrictions of analysing advertising bans' effects by time series approaches, also different approaches should be used in the future.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 11 19%
Unknown 11 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 15 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 14 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,039,032
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Public Health
#216
of 1,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,409
of 84,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Public Health
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,433 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them