| Title |
Flood risk analyses—how detailed do we need to be?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Natural Hazards, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11069-008-9277-8 |
| Authors |
H. Apel, G. T. Aronica, H. Kreibich, A. H. Thieken |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 600 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 2% |
| Unknown | 572 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 103 | 17% |
| Researcher | 81 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 42 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 4% |
| Other | 80 | 13% |
| Unknown | 128 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 185 | 31% |
| Environmental Science | 103 | 17% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 91 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 43 | 7% |
| Unknown | 153 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 265. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2020.
All research outputs
#139,265
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Natural Hazards
#8
of 2,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241
of 100,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Hazards
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them