↓ Skip to main content

Think You Can Shrink? A Proof-of-Concept Study for Men’s Health Education Through Edutainment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
Think You Can Shrink? A Proof-of-Concept Study for Men’s Health Education Through Edutainment
Published in
Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s41347-016-0009-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas Ungar, Cameron D. Norman, Stephanie Knaak

Abstract

Connecting people to useful, actionable health resources is a substantive challenge that sits at the heart of health communication. Digital media provides means of producing, distributing and revising content and creates possibilities for new and multiple channels for reaching and engaging audiences, particularly when combined with social media. While there is much promise of digital media forms to deliver audiences and promote engagement, the health communication landscape is still largely hit-and-miss with few 'best practice' examples to follow. Proof-of-concept studies allow for a structured, focused exploration of ways to leverage the potential of digital media and learn what approaches have the promise to invest resources in amid a sea of possible options. Think You Can Shrink? (TYCS) is a multi-episode web series modelled on a reality TV show format. The show's key objective is to educate men and demonstrate, through modelling, ways men can support other men to encourage help-seeking behaviours and greater health communication, which in turn, may also lead to better health outcomes. Given the newness of the approach, the project was launched as a proof-of-concept study to explore: (a) whether this approach could engage the interest of men, (b) what initial impact this approach might induce and

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 8 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 4 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 9 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2017.
All research outputs
#1,111,139
of 23,630,563 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,968
of 425,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Technology in Behavioral Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,630,563 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them