| Title |
Self-Exclusion Program: A Longitudinal Evaluation Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gambling Studies, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10899-006-9032-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert Ladouceur, Caroline Sylvain, Patrick Gosselin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 58 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 12 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 25% |
| Psychology | 15 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2019.
All research outputs
#3,697,942
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gambling Studies
#185
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,813
of 168,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gambling Studies
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.