You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quantifying the sampling error in tree census measurements by volunteers and its effect on carbon stock estimates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1890/11-2059.1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nathalie Butt, Eleanor Slade, Jill Thompson, Yadvinder Malhi, Terhi Riutta |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 137 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 18% |
| Unknown | 24 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 48 | 34% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 40 | 28% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 7% |
| Unknown | 32 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2013.
All research outputs
#21,075,298
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#3,290
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,476
of 209,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#19
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.