Title |
Assessing the predictive value of HIV indicator conditions in general practice: a case–control study using the THIN database
|
---|---|
Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2013
|
DOI | 10.3399/bjgp13x668159 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sarah Damery, Linda Nichols, Roger Holder, Ronan Ryan, Sue Wilson, Sally Warmington, Helen Stokes-Lampard, Kaveh Manavi |
Abstract |
UK HIV guidelines identify 37 clinical indicator conditions for adult HIV infection that should prompt an HIV test. However, few data currently exist to show their predictive value in identifying undiagnosed HIV. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 15 | 47% |
Spain | 5 | 16% |
Ireland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 11 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 20 | 63% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 25% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Student > Master | 4 | 5% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 18 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 28 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
Other | 11 | 14% |
Unknown | 22 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#1,738,106
of 25,959,914 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#844
of 4,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,204
of 210,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#8
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,959,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,934 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.