| Title |
Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, August 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-009-0088-9 |
| Authors |
A. J. M. Linmans |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 3 | 3% |
| Germany | 3 | 3% |
| United States | 3 | 3% |
| Spain | 3 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 76 | 77% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Librarian | 22 | 22% |
| Researcher | 21 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Professor | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 32 | 32% |
| Computer Science | 19 | 19% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 19% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |