↓ Skip to main content

How the World Survived the Population Bomb: Lessons From 50 Years of Extraordinary Demographic History

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
109 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
Title
How the World Survived the Population Bomb: Lessons From 50 Years of Extraordinary Demographic History
Published in
Demography, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13524-011-0070-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Lam

Abstract

The world population will reach 7 billion in late 2011, a demographic milestone that is causing renewed attention to the challenges caused by population growth. This article looks at the last 50 years of demographic change, one of the most extraordinary periods in demographic history. During this period, world population grew at rates that have never been seen before and will almost surely never be seen again. There were many concerns about the potential impact of rapid population growth in the 1960s, including mass starvation in countries such as India, depletion of nonrenewable resources, and increased poverty in low-income countries. The actual experience was very different. World food production increased faster than world population in every decade since the 1960s, resource prices fell during most of the period, and poverty declined significantly in much of the developing world. The article considers the economic and demographic explanations for the surprising successes of this important period in demographic history. It also looks at regions that have been less successful, especially Africa, and at the lessons for dealing with the important challenges that still remain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 11 3%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 373 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 23%
Student > Master 63 16%
Student > Bachelor 54 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 34 9%
Researcher 30 8%
Other 55 14%
Unknown 69 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 172 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 19 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 4%
Environmental Science 14 4%
Other 67 17%
Unknown 82 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 134. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2023.
All research outputs
#308,168
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#77
of 2,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,067
of 145,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 145,037 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them