↓ Skip to main content

Craniometric evidence for Palaeoamerican survival in Baja California

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, September 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Craniometric evidence for Palaeoamerican survival in Baja California
Published in
Nature, September 2003
DOI 10.1038/nature01816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rolando González-José, Antonio González-Martín, Miquel Hernández, Héctor M. Pucciarelli, Marina Sardi, Alfonso Rosales, Silvina Van der Molen

Abstract

A current issue on the settlement of the Americas refers to the lack of morphological affinities between early Holocene human remains (Palaeoamericans) and modern Amerindian groups, as well as the degree of contribution of the former to the gene pool of the latter. A different origin for Palaeoamericans and Amerindians is invoked to explain such a phenomenon. Under this hypothesis, the origin of Palaeoamericans must be traced back to a common ancestor for Palaeoamericans and Australians, which departed from somewhere in southern Asia and arrived in the Australian continent and the Americas around 40,000 and 12,000 years before present, respectively. Most modern Amerindians are believed to be part of a second, morphologically differentiated migration. Here we present evidence of a modern Amerindian group from the Baja California Peninsula in Mexico, showing clearer affinities with Palaeoamerican remains than with modern Amerindians. Climatic changes during the Middle Holocene probably generated the conditions for isolation from the continent, restricting the gene flow of the original group with northern populations, which resulted in the temporal continuity of the Palaeoamerican morphological pattern to the present.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Argentina 11 6%
Spain 2 1%
Mexico 2 1%
Brazil 2 1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Cuba 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Hungary 1 <1%
Other 3 2%
Unknown 175 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 10%
Professor 17 9%
Other 57 28%
Unknown 10 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 101 51%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 13%
Social Sciences 24 12%
Arts and Humanities 11 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 4%
Other 15 8%
Unknown 16 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,189,117
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#42,406
of 90,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,728
of 49,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#94
of 360 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 49,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 360 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.