↓ Skip to main content

Effectiveness of the Wraparound Process for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
145 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Effectiveness of the Wraparound Process for Children with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders: A Meta-Analysis
Published in
Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, October 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10567-009-0059-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jesse C. Suter, Eric J. Bruns

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 6%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 144 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 18%
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 27 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 56 36%
Social Sciences 41 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 3%
Arts and Humanities 2 1%
Other 10 6%
Unknown 33 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2018.
All research outputs
#7,916,538
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#247
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,570
of 96,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them