| Title |
Diamond electrodes for electrochemical analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10800-010-0112-z |
| Authors |
Yasuaki Einaga |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 127 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 13% |
| Unknown | 35 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 44 | 35% |
| Engineering | 13 | 10% |
| Materials Science | 12 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 36 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2012.
All research outputs
#3,259,664
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#22
of 831 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,010
of 94,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Electrochemistry
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 831 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them