↓ Skip to main content

Task force report: Social networks as mediators of social support

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, March 1980
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
262 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Task force report: Social networks as mediators of social support
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, March 1980
DOI 10.1007/bf00780665
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roger E. Mitchell, Edison J. Trickett

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Portugal 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 85%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 25%
Student > Master 10 18%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 18 33%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 9%
Psychology 5 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 11 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2012.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#435
of 1,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,655
of 6,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,365 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 6,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them