↓ Skip to main content

Friendship in High-functioning Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Mixed and Non-mixed Dyads

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
205 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Friendship in High-functioning Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: Mixed and Non-mixed Dyads
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, December 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10803-007-0501-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nirit Bauminger, Marjorie Solomon, Anat Aviezer, Kelly Heung, John Brown, Sally J. Rogers

Abstract

Friendships containing a child with autism and a friend with typical development ("mixed" friendships, n = 26) and those of children with autism and a friend with a disability ("non-mixed," n = 16) were contrasted with friendships of typically developing subjects and their friends (n = 31). Measures included dyadic interaction samples, and interview and questionnaire data from subjects, friends, and parents. Mixed friendship interactions resembled typical friendships. Participants in mixed friendships were more responsive to one another, had stronger receptive language skills, exhibited greater positive social orientation and cohesion, and demonstrated more complex coordinated play than in the non-mixed dyads. Exposure to typical peers appears to have significant effects on friendship behaviors.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 205 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 197 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 20%
Student > Master 40 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 11%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Researcher 11 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 36 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 89 43%
Social Sciences 25 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Computer Science 7 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 46 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2017.
All research outputs
#7,670,027
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#2,767
of 5,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,796
of 160,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#14
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,240 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 160,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.