You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An analysis of the use of plant products for commerce in remote aboriginal communities of northern Australia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Botany, December 2006
|
| DOI | 10.1663/0013-0001(2006)60[362:aaotuo]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Julian T. Gorman, Anthony D. Griffiths, Peter J. Whitehead |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Argentina | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 15% |
| Professor | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 24% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 10 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 9% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,655,377
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Economic Botany
#73
of 898 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,594
of 168,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Botany
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 898 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,055 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them