↓ Skip to main content

Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Child and Family Studies, March 1996
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
202 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
Title
Individualized services and supports through the wraparound process: Philosophy and procedures
Published in
Journal of Child and Family Studies, March 1996
DOI 10.1007/bf02234675
Authors

John E. VanDenBerg, E. Mary Grealish

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 14%
Unknown 25 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Master 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 7%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 1 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 15 52%
Social Sciences 10 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 3%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2009.
All research outputs
#7,926,100
of 23,867,274 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#652
of 1,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,528
of 27,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Child and Family Studies
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,867,274 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,463 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 27,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.