| Title |
Never the twain shall meet? - a comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, June 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-63 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Per Nilsen, Christian Ståhl, Kerstin Roback, Paul Cairney |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 11 | 24% |
| Canada | 4 | 9% |
| Ireland | 3 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 7% |
| South Africa | 2 | 4% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Singapore | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 48% |
| Scientists | 18 | 39% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 477 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| South Africa | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | <1% |
| Unknown | 457 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 86 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 67 | 14% |
| Researcher | 63 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 44 | 9% |
| Other | 32 | 7% |
| Other | 97 | 20% |
| Unknown | 88 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 140 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 77 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 39 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 26 | 5% |
| Psychology | 19 | 4% |
| Other | 64 | 13% |
| Unknown | 112 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,025,621
of 25,734,859 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#143
of 1,820 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,081
of 210,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,734,859 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,820 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.