↓ Skip to main content

Ecological effects of the North Atlantic Oscillation

Overview of attention for article published in Oecologia, June 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
587 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
880 Mendeley
Title
Ecological effects of the North Atlantic Oscillation
Published in
Oecologia, June 2001
DOI 10.1007/s004420100655
Pubmed ID
Authors

Geir Ottersen, Benjamin Planque, Andrea Belgrano, Eric Post, Philip C. Reid, Nils C. Stenseth

Abstract

Climatic oscillations as reflected in atmospheric modes such as the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO) may be seen as a proxy for regulating forces in aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems. Our review highlights the variety of climate processes related to the NAO and the diversity in the type of ecological responses that different biological groups can display. Available evidence suggests that the NAO influences ecological dynamics in both marine and terrestrial systems, and its effects may be seen in variation at the individual, population and community levels. The ecological responses to the NAO encompass changes in timing of reproduction, population dynamics, abundance, spatial distribution and interspecific relationships such as competition and predator-prey relationships. This indicates that local responses to large-scale changes may be more subtle than previously suggested. We propose that the NAO effects may be classified as three types: direct, indirect and integrated. Such a classification will help the design and interpretation of analyses attempting to relate ecological changes to the NAO and, possibly, to climate in general.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 880 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 1%
Germany 8 <1%
United Kingdom 8 <1%
Spain 7 <1%
Canada 6 <1%
Portugal 5 <1%
France 5 <1%
Norway 4 <1%
Italy 4 <1%
Other 30 3%
Unknown 791 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 212 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 181 21%
Student > Master 127 14%
Student > Bachelor 88 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 4%
Other 126 14%
Unknown 115 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 411 47%
Environmental Science 201 23%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 68 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 1%
Engineering 7 <1%
Other 34 4%
Unknown 149 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,907,044
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Oecologia
#710
of 4,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,201
of 42,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oecologia
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,909 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 42,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.