↓ Skip to main content

Tumoral PD-L1 expression in desmoplastic melanoma is associated with depth of invasion, tumor-infiltrating CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes and the mixed cytomorphological variant

Overview of attention for article published in Modern Pathology, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tumoral PD-L1 expression in desmoplastic melanoma is associated with depth of invasion, tumor-infiltrating CD8 cytotoxic lymphocytes and the mixed cytomorphological variant
Published in
Modern Pathology, January 2017
DOI 10.1038/modpathol.2016.210
Pubmed ID
Authors

Noah Frydenlund, Dominick Leone, Shi Yang, Mai P Hoang, April Deng, Marier Hernandez-Perez, Rajendra Singh, Asok Biswas, Ron Yaar, Meera Mahalingam

Abstract

Recently, patients with metastatic desmoplastic melanoma (DM) have been shown to respond more favorably to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy than other melanoma subtypes. Given this, we evaluated PD-L1/2 expression in primary DM samples and correlated these with subtype, CD8+ lymphocyte status, histopathological prognosticators, and select genetic alterations. Eighty-six (36 mixed DM, 50 pure DM) archival annotated samples met inclusion criteria and were immunohistochemically semiquantitatively evaluated. Per established criteria, for PD-L1/L2, cases with ⩾5% tumoral expression, and for CD8, cases with a predominantly peri/intratumoral CD8+ infiltrate were scored positive. Univariate analysis (chi-square and Wilcoxon) identified potential confounders and a nested case-control study was accomplished using multiple logistic regression. For PD-L1, 49% of cases were positive and 71% of cases with thickness >4 mm were positive; PD-L1 expression differed by median depth (3.29 mm, interquartile range=3.58 mm for PD-L1 positives vs 1.75 mm, interquartile range=2.04 mm for PD-L1 negatives, P=0.0002) and was linearly associated with increasing depth of invasion (P=0.0003). PD-L1-positive cases were more likely to display CD8+ lymphocytes (60 vs 28% P=0.0047).The presence of CD8+ lymphocytes correlated significantly with depth of invasion >1 mm (P=0.022). On multivariate analysis, PD-L1 was 6.14 × more likely to be expressed in mixed DM than pure DM (P=0.0131), CD8+ staining was 6.22 × more likely in PD-L1 positive cases than in PD-L1 negative (P=0.0118), and tumor depth was associated with greater odds of PD-L1 expression (OR=1.61, P=0.0181). PD-L2 expression was observed in 48% of cases but did not correlate with any variables. Correlation of tumoral PD-L1 with increased depth and CD8+ lymphocytes implicates the tumoral immune microenvironment with advancing disease in DM. Enhanced tumoral PD-L1 expression in the mixed cytomorphological variant provides an insight into the differential pathogenesis of the subtypes and suggests that these patients are likely better candidates for anti-PD/PD-L1 therapy.Modern Pathology advance online publication, 13 January 2017; doi:10.1038/modpathol.2016.210.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 6 19%
Unknown 8 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Unknown 10 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2017.
All research outputs
#14,783,688
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Modern Pathology
#2,291
of 3,283 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,539
of 423,470 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Modern Pathology
#39
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,283 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 423,470 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.