↓ Skip to main content

Hydroxyurea treatment effect on children with sickle cell disease and obstructive sleep apnea

Overview of attention for article published in Sleep and Breathing, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Hydroxyurea treatment effect on children with sickle cell disease and obstructive sleep apnea
Published in
Sleep and Breathing, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s11325-017-1458-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J. Grady, Jane S. Hankins, Brent Haberman, Robert Schoumacher, Rose Mary Stocks

Abstract

While hydroxyurea is the mainstay of treatment for many of the comorbidities associated with sickle cell disease, its effect on obstructive sleep apnea has not been fully investigated. The purpose of this project is to help characterize the effects of hydroxyurea on obstructive sleep apnea in children with sickle cell disease and determine its therapeutic role in the condition. Chart review was conducted on two pediatric patients with sickle cell disease who experienced resolution of obstructive sleep apnea following hydroxyurea administration. After undergoing approximately 11 months of hydroxyurea therapy, sleep apnea symptoms improved and obstructive sleep apnea resolution was confirmed by repeat polysomnography in both cases. This resolution was largely secondary to a reduction in the obstructive component of the apnea hypopnea index, highlighting a previously unreported association. As adenotonsillectomy is associated with significant risks in patients with sickle cell disease, it appears reasonable to consider a period of observation for improvement of obstructive sleep apnea following hydroxyurea administration rather than directly proceeding with surgery.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 6 18%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 9 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Psychology 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2017.
All research outputs
#13,168,546
of 22,940,083 outputs
Outputs from Sleep and Breathing
#493
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,587
of 421,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Sleep and Breathing
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,940,083 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.