↓ Skip to main content

Working for learning: teaching assistants developing mathematics for teaching

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, December 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Working for learning: teaching assistants developing mathematics for teaching
Published in
Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, December 2008
DOI 10.1007/s10857-008-9094-8
Authors

Pat Drake

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Bulgaria 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 26%
Professor 5 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 10%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 10 24%
Unknown 6 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 57%
Mathematics 8 19%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Unknown 7 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 December 2008.
All research outputs
#5,544,795
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
#68
of 315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,441
of 164,934 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 315 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,934 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them