↓ Skip to main content

Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Studies in Mathematics, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
140 Mendeley
Title
Intuitive vs analytical thinking: four perspectives
Published in
Educational Studies in Mathematics, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s10649-008-9175-8
Authors

Uri Leron, Orit Hazzan

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 140 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 131 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 17%
Student > Master 21 15%
Lecturer 20 14%
Researcher 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 23 16%
Unknown 29 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 43 31%
Mathematics 21 15%
Psychology 14 10%
Computer Science 5 4%
Physics and Astronomy 4 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 33 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2009.
All research outputs
#5,544,795
of 22,711,645 outputs
Outputs from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#175
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,652
of 169,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Studies in Mathematics
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,711,645 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.